Understanding BRICS: An Introduction to the Emerging Economic Powerhouse

Unless you’ve been living under a rock or have no interest in global politics, you’ve likely heard of BRICS — the formidable coalition of emerging economies seeking to reshape the world order. This powerful bloc, consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, has been making waves and rattling the cages of Western economic dominance since its inception in the early 2000s.

Who Are the BRICS Nations?

The BRICS is an association of five major emerging national economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. The acronym BRIC was first coined in 2001 by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O’Neill in a research paper entitled “Building Better Global Economic BRICs”.

In the 2001 research paper, O’Neill argued that the economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China were rapidly developing and by the year 2050 could eclipse most of the current richest countries in the world. The four nations had widespread poverty alongside vast resource and labor pools which presented immense investment opportunities as they industrialized.

What Have They Achieved?

Over the next decade, the BRICs worked to leverage their large populations and economies of scale to increase trade and economic cooperation. The 1st BRIC Summit was held in Yekaterinburg, Russia, in 2009. In 2010, South Africa officially joined the group, leading to the new acronym BRICS.

Today, the BRICS nations make up over 40% of the global population and account for over 30% of the world’s GDP in terms of purchasing power parity. Their combined foreign currency reserves are more than $4 trillion. BRICS is essentially a counterweight to Western economic dominance and gives developing nations a greater voice on global matters.

What Are Their Objectives?

Despite their diversity, the BRICS nations have forged cooperation around reforming global financial institutions like the World Bank and IMF to give developing economies more power. In 2014, they launched the New Development Bank to finance infrastructure projects across BRICS and other emerging economies.

What Do the Critics Say?

However, sceptics have criticized BRICS for lacking moral cohesiveness and democratic values. There are also concerns about protectionist policies, corruption, and human rights issues in some member states. Disagreements over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have put strains on BRICS unity recently.

Within individual BRICS nations, the picture is mixed in terms of economic progress over the past two decades. China has emerged as an economic superpower while India and Russia have seen solid growth. Brazil has endured economic turmoil and political upheaval. South Africa remains saddled with inequality, poverty, and corruption scandals.

What Are Their Future Proposals?

Looking ahead, BRICS aims to boost trade between members through proposed initiatives like payment systems ‘to avoid’ using U.S. dollars. They also seek greater cooperation around renewable energy, scientific research, security, and fighting climate change and COVID-19.

BRICS stands at a total of 11, the group now include Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Saudi Arabia which had all been invited to join the group in January of 2024.

The bloc’s long-term vision is to serve as an engine for driving growth and development across the Global South. Whether BRICS can effectively challenge Western economic dominance amid conflicting interests between members remains to be seen. However, BRICS is increasingly becoming a formidable rival to G7 powers of the world and they could reshape geoeconomics and geopolitics across a range of issues such as the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

Overall, while BRICS wields considerable economic and demographic clout, its future cohesion and ability to meet its founding goals are uncertain. The block highlights both the opportunities and challenges that come with a shifting global balance of power.

Can BRICS-led initiatives, such as the New Development Bank, emerge as viable alternatives to Western-dominated global financial institutions?

While BRICS has taken steps to counter Western economic dominance through initiatives like the New Development Bank (NDB), the ability of such institutions to become full-fledged alternatives faces significant challenges. The NDB’s $100 billion capital base pales in comparison to the World Bank’s $280+ billion, limiting its current lending capacity. Expanding membership beyond the 5 BRICS nations could provide more capital but raises governance hurdles.

The NDB also must build a more diversified project portfolio and establish its reputation and expertise as a neutral, standards-based lender. Crucially, it requires the ability to raise funds cost-effectively from capital markets. Geopolitical tensions between BRICS members like Russia, China and India add another complicating factor. While the NDB represents an initial move to offer developing countries additional financing options, becoming a comprehensive alternative on par with leading multilateral institutions would likely require much larger capitalization, expanded membership, and depoliticized governance over many years. In the short term, the NDB aims to carve out a complementary lending niche while still cooperating with existing development banks.

Final Thoughts

BRICS has made significant strides but still faces an uphill journey ahead. While achieving major milestones like establishing the New Development Bank and boosting intra-BRICS trade, domestic disturbances like the Ukraine war and inequality in South Africa strain unity. Potential expansion and attracting investment remain crucial next steps.

The Western world’s economic dominance is being challenged by formidable forces like BRICS, which provides an alternative model and counterweight. BRICS has over 40% of the global population and 30% of GDP, this demonstrates that BRICS wields immense economic clout. However, realizing its vision faces hurdles of internal divisions from diverse political systems, economic stages, and competing interests among members.

Concerns like protectionism, human rights, and the Ukraine invasion undermine BRICS’ moral authority and cohesion. Moving forward, goals include further trade or finance integration, renewable energy cooperation, and driving sustainable development across the Global South.

Achieving this requires overcoming external opposition and internal unity challenges. Whether BRICS evolves into a true counterweight will hinge on balancing common interests with respecting sovereignty amid the global power shift. Its path exemplifies opportunities and obstacles large emerging economies face in challenging the established economic order. However, if you want real change, it must at times be met with force among justification and any opposition willing to resist it will be met with force.

BRICS ultimately is a real game changer in the geopolitical world where a power struggle amongst nations has always been at the core of global dominance in an age where we make new alliances to achieve our objective against an opposing and more powerful force.

REFERENCES

> Goldman Sachs, 2001. Building Better Global Economic BRICs. Global Economics Paper No: 66.

> Ministry of External Affairs, 2023. Brief on BRICS. [PDF] Available at: https://www.mea.gov.in/brics.pdf [Accessed 31 March 2024].

> International Monetary Fund, 2011. New Growth Drivers for Low-Income Countries: The Role of BRICs. Prepared by the Strategy, Policy, and Review Department.

> Atlantic Council, 2023. BRICS is doubling its membership. Is the bloc a new rival for the G7? [online] Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/experts-react/brics-is-doubling-its-membership-is-the-bloc-a-new-rival-for-the-g7/ [Accessed 30 March 2024].

‍